Verdict
All guidesResearchMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.1). The gap is mostly about heavier runners needing maximum support and durability — read the strengths below before deciding.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Higher ratedRanked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
$124.95as of Jun 7

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 delivers on its reputation as a stability powerhouse with improved durability and shock absorption, according to RunRepeat's review. Tom's Guide noted its thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, though the firmer foam and low energy return stand out. The shoe's reduced drop makes it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. However, reviewers criticized its lack of energy return and premium pricing, especially in Europe. It's ideal for heavier runners seeking comfort and support but not for those wanting a lively ride.

Strengths
  • — Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • — Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • — Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • — Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • — Overpriced in Europe
  • — Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
$124.95 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
Ranked #8 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
$29.95as of Jun 7

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 is a moderate stability shoe designed for daily training, offering plush cushioning and a comfortable ride. Reviewers noted its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole delivers balanced shock absorption and energy return, with a heel stack height of 36.8mm. The updated upper features engineered mesh for structure and breathability, though some reviewers found it lacking in durability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed solid performance in cushioning and traction, though they noted the shoe's weight and upper breathability as drawbacks. This shoe is ideal for heel strikers seeking a versatile daily trainer but may not suit those wanting maximum stability or a minimalist feel.

Strengths
  • — Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride
  • — Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions
  • — Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions
Watch-outs
  • — Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers
  • — Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz
  • — Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs
$29.95 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 offers more plush cushioning than the Saucony Tempus 2 and better durability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the ASICS GT-2000 14 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
Weight10.4 oz / 295g10.5 oz (298 g)
Stack Height39.9 mm38 mm
Drop8 mm8 mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOFresh Foam X
StabilityYesMedial post
Arch SupportMediumModerate
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleHYBRID ASICSGRIPBlown rubber
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet