RunRepeat's review confirms the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 lives up to its stability reputation, with better durability and shock absorption than before. Tom's Guide noted the thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, while the firmer foam and low energy return are hard to miss. Its reduced drop makes it a better match for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Reviewers criticized the energy return and the premium price, especially in Europe. Heavier runners who want comfort and support will be well served; anyone who wants a lively ride will not.
Full review
Design Evolution and Fit
The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 represents a subtle but meaningful evolution from its predecessor, with the most notable change being its 8mm drop—marking the first time the Kayano series has adopted such a low heel-to-toe gradient. Tom's Guide noted that this adjustment makes the shoe more accessible to midfoot and forefoot strikers who previously avoided the Kayano due to its higher drop. The redesigned upper features an engineered stretch knit that provides a snug, adaptable fit, according to RunRepeat's review, which contrasted sharply with the wider fit of versions 30 and 31. Runners like those reviewed by RunningshoesGuru found the upper to be 'hug-like' and 'broken-in' from the first wear, with a tailored fit that eliminates the bulkiness noted in prior versions. The tongue design was also refined, with reduced cushioning to improve adaptability, and a gusseted tongue with a pull tab for easier onboarding, as highlighted by Running Shoes Guru's reviewer.
Cushioning and Comfort Performance
Cushioning in the Gel-Kayano 32 continues to rely on FF Blast+ foam, though with a denser and lighter formula compared to previous iterations, as noted by RunningshoesGuru. The shoe maintains a 40mm heel stack height and 32mm forefoot, offering a 2mm increase in forefoot height that contributes to the new 8mm drop. Doctor of Running's Matt Klein observed that while the midsole remains well-cushioned, it is slightly firmer than the previous version, which may be a trade-off for enhanced stability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot, demonstrating strong shock absorption, though the energy return score of 47.8% was deemed underwhelming by the same source. The Kayano 32's PureGEL technology in the rear provides softness for heel strikers, but the overall firmness may not appeal to runners seeking a plush, bouncy ride, as noted by RunRepeat's analysis.
Stability and Support Systems
The Kayano 32's 4D Guidance System continues to be a standout feature, providing excellent stability for overpronators, as confirmed by RunningshoesGuru and RunRepeat. This system integrates four key elements: a wider base, secure fit, lateral grooves, and an energy bounce system in the midfoot. According to Doctor of Running’s review, the 4D Guidance System adapts to various pronation patterns, though the reviewer, who is a forefoot striker, found it difficult to assess its accuracy. However, the shoe's stability is universally praised, with RunRepeat’s lab results showing that it remains one of the most stable shoes tested, even with the firmer midsole. The outsole uses Hybrid ASICS Grip technology, which RunningshoesGuru rated highly for traction on all surfaces, while RunRepeat noted the durable outsole with excellent grip that supports long-term use.
Real-World Performance and Durability
In reviewers' real-world testing, the Kayano 32 proved to be a reliable daily trainer, with RunningshoesGuru's reviewer logging various training sessions from easy recovery miles to longer tempo runs, finding the shoe versatile and comfortable. The shoe's durability was also a point of emphasis, with RunRepeat rating the outsole as 'good' and the overall build quality as excellent. However, the weight of the shoe, at 10.5 oz for men's size 9, was noted as a drawback by multiple reviewers. RunRepeat highlighted that the Kayano 32 is still on the heavy side, which may be a concern for runners who prefer lighter, more agile shoes. Additionally, while the upper is praised for its comfort and breathability, RunningshoesGuru noted that breathability could feel limiting on hotter days, a minor but relevant issue for some runners.
47.8% energy return, the lowest in its class
Despite its many strengths, the Kayano 32 has several shortcomings that may deter certain runners. RunRepeat criticized the low energy return, scoring just 47.8%, which makes it less ideal for runners seeking a lively, springy ride. The firmness of the midsole, while beneficial for stability, may not appeal to runners who prefer a softer, more cushioned feel, as noted by Doctor of Running. Additionally, the shoe's weight, at 10.5 oz, is considered high by many reviewers, with RunningshoesGuru noting that it's still quite heavy despite minor improvements in the foam formula. The reduced breathability, while not a dealbreaker, was noted by RunningshoesGuru as a potential issue during hot weather. The Kayano 32 also lacks the bounce that some runners might expect from a premium stability shoe, which could be a downside for those looking for a more dynamic running experience.
8mm drop suits heavier overpronators
The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is best suited for runners who prioritize stability and comfort over lightweight performance. It is ideal for heavier runners with mild to severe pronation, as the 4D Guidance System and PureGEL technology provide excellent support and shock absorption. RunRepeat recommends the Kayano 32 for those seeking a tank-like stability trainer with a long-lasting outsole, particularly for daily running and long-distance training. The shoe is also suitable for runners who have previously used versions 30 or 31 and want more of the same with small improvements. However, runners seeking a more agile or lightweight trainer, or those who prefer a higher energy return, may find the Kayano 32 less appealing. The 8mm drop makes it more accessible to midfoot and forefoot strikers, but those accustomed to a 10-12mm drop may need time to adjust, as noted by RunningshoesGuru.
Adidas Supernova Solution has more bounce
Compared to its direct competitors, the Kayano 32 holds its own in terms of stability and support, though it may fall short in energy return. RunRepeat's comparison with the ASICS GT-2000 14 and Saucony Tempus 2 shows that while the Kayano 32 offers superior shock absorption and stability, it lacks the bounce and lighter weight of these alternatives. The Kayano 32 is priced at $165, which is competitive with the GT-2000 and Saucony Tempus 2, but its higher weight and lower energy return make it less appealing to runners seeking a more dynamic ride. In contrast, the Adidas Supernova Solution, which RunRepeat recommends for runners seeking more energy return, offers a bounce-filled midsole that the Kayano 32 lacks. The Kayano 32's durability and stability, however, make it a strong contender for runners who prioritize support over speed.
83/100 audience score justifies the price
At $165, the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 is positioned as a premium stability shoe, and its price reflects the quality and features it offers. RunRepeat's audience score of 83 out of 100 and Running Shoes Guru's 9 for comfort and 10 for build quality suggest that the shoe delivers good value for its target demographic. However, the high price point, especially in Europe, as noted by some reviewers, may be a barrier for budget-conscious runners. The Kayano 32's long-term durability and performance make it a solid investment for runners who rely on stability and support, but those seeking a more affordable option may want to consider alternatives like the GT-2000 or other stability-focused shoes that offer similar features at a lower cost.
Strengths
- +Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
- +Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
- +Dependable for most pronators with stable support
- +Improved fit and pillow-soft heel padding
Watch-outs
- −Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
- −Overpriced in Europe
- −Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
How it compares
The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.
Rating sources
Our 4.3 score is the average of the 5 scored reviews above; 1 more reviewed it without printing a score and is not in the average. More about methodology.
