Verdict
All guidesResearchMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.
The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
6 sources$124.95as of Aug 1

RunRepeat's review confirms the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 lives up to its stability reputation, with better durability and shock absorption than before. Tom's Guide noted the thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, while the firmer foam and low energy return are hard to miss. Its reduced drop makes it a better match for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Reviewers criticized the energy return and the premium price, especially in Europe. Heavier runners who want comfort and support will be well served; anyone who wants a lively ride will not.

Strengths
  • — Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • — Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • — Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • — Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • — Overpriced in Europe
  • — Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
$124.95 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Saucony Tempus 2
Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Tempus 2
5 sources$169.95as of Aug 1

Still one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, the Saucony Tempus 2 runs on energetic PWRRUN PB foam with strong energy return. Reviewers praised the stability and durability, and RunRepeat called it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers who want a responsive daily trainer. The complaints center on a snug fit, particularly through the forefoot, and poor breathability. Doctors of Running noted the tapered toe box can cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short to lock the foot down. Runners with narrow to standard feet who want stability and energy return more than cushioning and airflow are the fit.

Strengths
  • — Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
  • — Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • — Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support
Watch-outs
  • — Poor breathability in upper mesh
  • — Slightly heavier than previous version
  • — Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box
$169.95 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32Saucony Tempus 2
Weight10.4 oz9.3 oz
Stack Height39.9 mm38 mm
Drop8 mm8 mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOPWRRUN PB
StabilityYesNeutral
Arch SupportMediumMedium
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleHYBRID ASICSGRIPXT-900 carbon rubber
Dimensions12.44 x 6.3 x 4.75 inches; 1.44 pounds—
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet