Verdict
All guidesResearchMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Saucony Guide 18

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Guide 18 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.4). The gap is mostly about overpronators seeking affordable stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
$124.95as of Jun 7

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 delivers on its reputation as a stability powerhouse with improved durability and shock absorption, according to RunRepeat's review. Tom's Guide noted its thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, though the firmer foam and low energy return stand out. The shoe's reduced drop makes it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. However, reviewers criticized its lack of energy return and premium pricing, especially in Europe. It's ideal for heavier runners seeking comfort and support but not for those wanting a lively ride.

Strengths
  • — Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • — Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • — Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • — Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • — Overpriced in Europe
  • — Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
$124.95 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Saucony Guide 18
Higher ratedRanked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Guide 18
$65.95as of Jun 7

The Saucony Guide 18 delivers dependable stability and pronation control, with Tom's Guide calling it a 'solid choice for stability seekers.' RunRepeat praised its exceptional upper breathability and cushioning for long runs, though noted the outsole design leaves too much foam exposed, potentially affecting durability. While reviewers appreciated the wide platform and secure lockdown, the midsole was described as firm and lacking in energy return compared to modern foams. This shoe is best suited for runners seeking a stable, supportive daily trainer at a reasonable price, but those looking for a more responsive ride may want to consider alternatives like the Brooks Glycerin GTS 21.

Strengths
  • — Ultra-breathable upper design improves comfort and ventilation
  • — Excellent pronation control and stable ride for overpronators
  • — Cushioned enough for long runs and comfortable for walking
Watch-outs
  • — Too much exposed foam on outsole raises durability concerns
  • — Midsole feels a bit firm and lacks energy return
  • — Outsole design doesn't provide sufficient rubber coverage for heavy strikers
$65.95 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Saucony Guide 18

The Saucony Guide 18 provides better breathability than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and more pronation control than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's less cushioned than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32Saucony Guide 18
Weight10.4 oz / 295g273g (Men's)
Stack Height39.9 mm36.0 mm
Drop8 mm8mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOPWRRUN PB
StabilityYesGuidance Rail
Arch SupportMediumStability
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleHYBRID ASICSGRIPXT-900 rubber
Tech—CenterPath stability
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet