Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs Hoka Gaviota 6

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.2 vs 4.7). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #8 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14

4.2

3 sources1 derived$109.95as of Aug 1

The ASICS GT-2000 14 is a stability daily trainer that swapped FF Blast+ for FF Blast Max and got softer and bouncier for it. RunRepeat scored it 87 out of 100, Road Trail Run 9.5 out of 10 and Doctors of Running 3.5 out of 5, a wide spread that reflects genuine disagreement about the fit. Support comes from geometry rather than a medial post, the outsole is durable, and the toebox is tapered enough to rule the shoe out for wide feet.

Strengths

— Improved FF Blast Max foam provides stronger shock absorption with 132 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot
— Outstanding outsole durability with dependable traction for everyday use
— Full-length medial stability system offers consistent support from heel to forefoot

Watch-outs

— Tapered toebox may feel restrictive and limits toe splay, especially for those needing extra room
— Limited breathability due to dense upper material, which can feel warm during long runs

$109.95 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

6 sources1 derived$180as of Aug 1

After a long wait, the Hoka Gaviota 6 updates a popular stability shoe with a better fit and more support. Reviewers noted the roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, plus an engineered mesh upper that feels comfortable and secure. Lab tests were less kind to the CMEVA foam, which is dated enough to deliver poor shock absorption and low energy return. It is lighter than most maximal stability shoes, but for many runners the performance doesn't justify $180. Runners who need maximum stability and room for wide feet are the fit; anyone after a livelier ride should look at the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at footwearetc.com Full review →

Derived means the reviewer published no score, so one was inferred from their written verdict. Everything else is a number the publisher printed. How we rank.

How they stack up

ASICS GT-2000 14

The ASICS GT-2000 14 offers better shock absorption than the Hoka Arahi 8 and provides more consistent support from heel to forefoot than the Saucony Guide 18. However, it's less breathable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and has a more restrictive toebox than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS GT-2000 14	Hoka Gaviota 6
Weight	9.6 oz	10 oz
Stack Height	36.5 mm heel / 28.5 mm forefoot	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot
Drop	8 mm	6mm
Midsole	FF Blast Max foam	CMEVA and PROFLY+
Stability	GuideTrac	J-Frame
Arch Support	Medium	Moderate
Upper	Engineered mesh	Engineered mesh
Outsole	AHAR rubber	Rubber
Dimensions	12.44 x 6.3 x 4.75 inches; 1.44 pounds	—

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet