Head-to-head · Best Fitness Trackers Under $200

Fitbit Charge 6 vs Garmin Vivosmart 5

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.

The short answer

Fitbit Charge 6 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.1 vs 3.8). The gap is mostly about Fitness enthusiasts wanting reliable tracking with better smart features — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Fitness Trackers Under $200

Fitbit Charge 6

4.1

5 sources$146.99as of Aug 1

PCMag's Angela Moscaritolo found the Fitbit Charge 6 solid on fitness tracking, with improved GPS and heart rate monitoring. Tom's Guide praised the long battery life and water resistance. Full health insights require a Fitbit Premium subscription, and reviewers noted the smartwatch features are limited next to competitors like Apple Watch or Garmin. It fits people who want reliable activity monitoring without deep smartphone integration; anyone who wants advanced smartwatch functionality should consider alternatives.

Strengths

— Improved GPS accuracy and reliability compared to previous models
— Enhanced heart rate monitoring with Fitbit Premium integration
— Long battery life up to 7 days with typical use

Watch-outs

— Premium subscription required for full feature access including advanced health metrics
— Limited smartwatch functionality compared to Apple Watch or Garmin devices
— Some users report occasional connectivity issues with smartphones

$146.99 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #3 in Best Fitness Trackers Under $200

Garmin Vivosmart 5

3.8

6 sources$149.99as of Aug 1

PCMag's review found the Garmin Vivosmart 5 solid on fundamentals, with accurate heart rate monitoring and all-day sleep analysis. TechRadar noted the strong waterproofing and battery life that stretches to a week. Both reviewers pointed to limitations in the app ecosystem and display visibility in bright conditions. It suits people who want reliable health metrics without the complexity of a full smartwatch; anyone who wants extensive smartphone integration will find it lacking.

Strengths

— Accurate heart rate monitoring with 24/7 tracking
— Waterproof design up to 50 meters for swimming and showering
— Long battery life of up to 7 days with smart notifications

Watch-outs

— Limited app ecosystem compared to competitors like Apple Watch
— Display can be difficult to read in bright sunlight

$149.99 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Fitbit Charge 6

The Fitbit Charge 6 stands out with improved GPS accuracy and heart rate monitoring compared to the Fitbit Inspire 3, but unlike the Garmin Vivosmart 5, it requires a premium subscription for full health insights. While the Xiaomi Mi Band 8 offers more sports modes, the Charge 6 provides better smartwatch functionality and connectivity than the budget-friendly Amazfit Band 7.

Garmin Vivosmart 5

The Garmin Vivosmart 5 excels in sleep tracking and heart rate accuracy compared to the Fitbit Charge 6, but lacks the smartwatch features that the Fitbit Inspire 3 offers. Unlike the Xiaomi Mi Band 8, it doesn't have 150 sports modes, and while the Amazfit Band 7 is more affordable, the Vivosmart 5 provides more comprehensive health metrics.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Fitbit Charge 6	Garmin Vivosmart 5
Battery Life	7 days typical use	Up to 7 days
Water Resistance	50 meters	50 meters
GPS	Yes	No
Heart Rate Monitor	Optical sensor	24/7 monitoring
Display	1.3-inch AMOLED	OLED
Weight	29 g	24 g
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.0, GPS	Bluetooth, ANT+

← See the full ranking of best fitness trackers under $200