Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Fitness Trackers Under $200

Fitbit Inspire 3 vs Garmin Vivosmart 5

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.
The short answer

Fitbit Inspire 3 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.2 vs 3.8). The gap is mostly about Users wanting straightforward fitness tracking without premium features — read the strengths below before deciding.

Fitbit Inspire 3
Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Fitness Trackers Under $200
Fitbit Inspire 3
6 sources$97.9as of Aug 1

The Fitbit Inspire 3 handles the fitness basics with a 7-day battery life and a waterproof build you can swim in. PCMag praised the accurate heart rate monitoring and comfortable wearability while noting it skips the smart features of higher-tier models. TechRadar highlighted its reliable performance for basic fitness tracking without the premium price tag. It suits people who want straightforward health monitoring rather than advanced smartwatch functionality.

Strengths
  • Battery lasts about 7 days even while using connected GPS from your phone
  • Waterproof design suitable for swimming
  • Accurate heart rate monitoring during workouts
Watch-outs
  • Limited smart features compared to premium models
  • No built-in GPS for non-Bluetooth tracking
Garmin Vivosmart 5
Ranked #3 in Best Fitness Trackers Under $200
Garmin Vivosmart 5
6 sources$149.99as of Aug 1

PCMag's review found the Garmin Vivosmart 5 solid on fundamentals, with accurate heart rate monitoring and all-day sleep analysis. TechRadar noted the strong waterproofing and battery life that stretches to a week. Both reviewers pointed to limitations in the app ecosystem and display visibility in bright conditions. It suits people who want reliable health metrics without the complexity of a full smartwatch; anyone who wants extensive smartphone integration will find it lacking.

Strengths
  • Accurate heart rate monitoring with 24/7 tracking
  • Waterproof design up to 50 meters for swimming and showering
  • Long battery life of up to 7 days with smart notifications
Watch-outs
  • Limited app ecosystem compared to competitors like Apple Watch
  • Display can be difficult to read in bright sunlight

How they stack up

Fitbit Inspire 3

The Fitbit Inspire 3 matches the Fitbit Charge 6 in waterproofing and battery life but lacks the advanced GPS accuracy of the Charge 6. Compared to the Garmin Vivosmart 5, it offers better smart features, while the Xiaomi Mi Band 8 provides more sports modes but lacks the Inspire 3's comfortable band design and accurate heart rate monitoring.

Garmin Vivosmart 5

The Garmin Vivosmart 5 excels in sleep tracking and heart rate accuracy compared to the Fitbit Charge 6, but lacks the smartwatch features that the Fitbit Inspire 3 offers. Unlike the Xiaomi Mi Band 8, it doesn't have 150 sports modes, and while the Amazfit Band 7 is more affordable, the Vivosmart 5 provides more comprehensive health metrics.

Specs side-by-side

SpecFitbit Inspire 3Garmin Vivosmart 5
Battery Life7 daysUp to 7 days
Water ResistanceYes50 meters
GPSYesNo
Heart Rate MonitorYes24/7 monitoring
Display1.3-inchOLED
Weight18.9 g24 g
ConnectivityBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth, ANT+
← See the full ranking of best fitness trackers under $200