Head-to-head · Best Cross Training Shoes

lululemon Chargefeel 3 vs Reebok Nano X5

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.

The short answer

Reebok Nano X5 comes out ahead by a clear margin (3.9 vs 4.6). The gap is mostly about athletes needing long-lasting gym shoes — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #9 in Best Cross Training Shoes

lululemon Chargefeel 3

3.9

4 sources3 derived$158as of Aug 1

The lululemon Chargefeel 3 is designed as a hybrid gym training shoe that performs well in strength classes and light running. Reviewers noted its lightweight build and breathable upper make it ideal for high-intensity gym sessions, though it's not recommended for long-distance running. The shoe features a snug fit with a narrow midfoot and toe box, and lacks significant arch support. While some users appreciated the stability for lateral movements and the sleek design for casual wear, others found the fit too tight and the lack of cushioning limiting for runners. It's best suited for those who primarily use it for gym workouts rather than running.

Strengths

— Good for gym workouts, strength training, and class activities
— Lightweight design suitable for short running segments
— Breathable laser-cut upper fabric

Watch-outs

— Not suitable for long running distances
— Narrow midfoot and toe box may not fit all foot types
— Lacks arch support which some users may find insufficient

$158 · Buy at shop.lululemon.com Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Cross Training Shoes

Reebok Nano X5

4.6

6 sources$91.77as of Aug 1

The Reebok Nano X5 delivers improved forefoot cushioning and a more comfortable step-in feel compared to previous models, thanks to its DualResponse midsole technology. Reviewers noted it offers better impact protection for high-impact activities like jumping and running, while maintaining stability for weightlifting. The shoe's fit has been widened, making it more accommodating for those who found earlier versions too snug. However, it lacks grip on wet or dusty surfaces and isn't ideal for individuals with wide feet. It's a solid general-purpose trainer but may not suit athletes seeking lighter or more flexible options.

Strengths

— Versatile for all-around gym use
— Increased impact protection in the forefoot with DualResponse midsole
— Fantastic durability and wear resistance

Watch-outs

— Lacks grip on wet and dusty floors
— Not suitable for wide feet

$91.77 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Derived means the reviewer published no score, so one was inferred from their written verdict. Everything else is a number the publisher printed. How we rank.

How they stack up

lululemon Chargefeel 3

The lululemon Chargefeel 3 provides a sleek design and breathable upper compared to the On Earth Move Trainer, which offers more anatomical comfort and stability. However, it's less suitable for long-distance running than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25, which has superior shock absorption.

Reebok Nano X5

The Reebok Nano X5 provides superior durability and impact protection compared to the Nike Metcon 10, which lacks the same level of forefoot cushioning. However, it falls short of the R.A.D. One V2 in terms of lifting platform stability and width accommodation for diverse foot shapes.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	lululemon Chargefeel 3	Reebok Nano X5
Drop	6 mm	—
Weight	8 oz womens	12 oz / 340g
Width	Medium	—
Cushioning	Moderate	DualResponse
Upper Material	breathable mesh	Flex Weave
Stability	4.0	Maximum stability for heavy lifting
Price	$148	—
Stack Height	—	27.0 mm

← See the full ranking of best cross training shoes