Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Saucony Hurricane 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and Saucony Hurricane 25 score essentially the same (4.3 vs 4.3). Pick the one whose trade-offs match your priorities — the strengths and watch-outs below are where they actually differ.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
$124.95as of Jun 7

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 delivers on its reputation as a stability powerhouse with improved durability and shock absorption, according to RunRepeat's review. Tom's Guide noted its thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, though the firmer foam and low energy return stand out. The shoe's reduced drop makes it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. However, reviewers criticized its lack of energy return and premium pricing, especially in Europe. It's ideal for heavier runners seeking comfort and support but not for those wanting a lively ride.

Strengths
  • Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • Overpriced in Europe
  • Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
Saucony Hurricane 25
Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Hurricane 25
$134.95as of Jun 7

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers impressive gains in energy return, cushioning, and comfort while shedding a full ounce of weight, according to RunRepeat's lab tests. Doctors of Running praised its bouncy, soft ride and lighter profile compared to previous versions, though they noted the shoe can feel mushy and less stable due to its softer midsole. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry provide a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, making it ideal for daily trainers seeking plush comfort and stability. However, reviewers criticized its lack of breathability and bulkiness, which may not suit runners prioritizing agility or budget-conscious buyers. This shoe is best for those who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths
  • Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
  • Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption
Watch-outs
  • Price hike from previous version at $169.95
  • Poor breathability due to flat knit upper
  • Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32Saucony Hurricane 25
Weight10.4 oz / 295g10 oz / 283g
Stack Height39.9 mm40.2 mm
Drop8 mm7.1 mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOPWRRUN PB foam
StabilityYesGuidesole
Arch SupportMediumMedium
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleHYBRID ASICSGRIPXT-900 carbon rubber
TechCenterPath stability
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet