Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Trail Running Shoes

Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Salomon Speedcross 6

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Salomon Speedcross 6 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.4 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about trail runners who tackle mud, soft ground, and wet, technical terrain and want maximum grip — read the strengths below before deciding.

Brooks Cascadia 19
Ranked #4 in Best Trail Running Shoes
Brooks Cascadia 19
$149.95as of Jun 7

The Cascadia 19 is the versatile, value all-rounder: Brooks slimmed and sharpened its long-running trail workhorse into a faster, more fun shoe that still handles varied terrain and doubles as a hiker. RunRepeat scored it 86/100, Run To The Finish rated it 90%, and reviewers praise its reliable traction, comfort, and adventure-ready durability.

Strengths
  • Slimmer, faster, and more fun than recent Cascadias while staying versatile
  • Reliable TrailTack Green traction across varied surfaces and weather
  • Highly versatile for both running and hiking, with excellent comfort and durability
Watch-outs
  • Shallower 3.8mm lugs are outclassed in deep mud
  • Heavier than nimbler trail shoes at about 10.8 oz
  • Less cushioning than max-stack rivals on very long rocky efforts
Salomon Speedcross 6
Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Trail Running Shoes
Salomon Speedcross 6
$130.04as of Jun 7

The Speedcross 6 is the mud-and-soft-ground specialist: deep 5.8mm Mud Contagrip lugs and a foot-hugging, protective upper make it the grip king on soft, loose, and wet terrain. RunRepeat scored it 89/100, and reviewers from iRunFar to Running Shoes Guru praise its reliable traction — while cautioning it is tailored to mud, not all-around running.

Strengths
  • Deep 5.8mm Mud Contagrip lugs deliver outstanding grip on mud and soft ground
  • Wide, self-clearing lug gaps shed mud effectively
  • Secure, foot-hugging fit and protective closed upper for technical terrain
Watch-outs
  • Specialist shoe — not an all-around or door-to-trail option
  • Aggressive lugs feel awkward on hard-packed trail and pavement
  • Lower stack and firmer ride than max-cushion rivals

How they stack up

Brooks Cascadia 19

A more affordable, versatile all-rounder than the premium Hoka Speedgoat 7, with shallower lugs and less grip in mud than the Salomon Speedcross 6. More cushioned and structured than the zero-drop Altra Lone Peak 9, and a close all-around rival to the value-focused Saucony Peregrine 14.

Salomon Speedcross 6

Grippier in mud and soft ground than the all-around Hoka Speedgoat 7, Brooks Cascadia 19, and Saucony Peregrine 14, thanks to its deeper, self-clearing lugs. Lower-stacked and firmer than the max-cushion Speedgoat, and a far more aggressive, structured shoe than the zero-drop, roomy Altra Lone Peak 9.

Specs side-by-side

SpecBrooks Cascadia 19Salomon Speedcross 6
Weight10.8 oz (M)10.4 oz (M)
Drop6mm (7.8mm measured)10mm (14.1mm measured)
Stack height34.8mm heel / 27.0mm forefoot36.5mm heel / 22.4mm forefoot
Support typeNeutralNeutral
CushioningModerate (DNA Loft v3)Moderate (EnergyCell)
OutsoleTrailTack GreenMud Contagrip
Lug depth3.8mm5.8mm
Width optionsStandard, WideStandard, Wide
← See the full ranking of best trail running shoes