Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6 vs Saucony Hurricane 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.7 vs 4.3). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

$180as of Jun 7

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at hoka.com Full review →

Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Hurricane 25

4.3

$134.95as of Jun 7

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers impressive gains in energy return, cushioning, and comfort while shedding a full ounce of weight, according to RunRepeat's lab tests. Doctors of Running praised its bouncy, soft ride and lighter profile compared to previous versions, though they noted the shoe can feel mushy and less stable due to its softer midsole. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry provide a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, making it ideal for daily trainers seeking plush comfort and stability. However, reviewers criticized its lack of breathability and bulkiness, which may not suit runners prioritizing agility or budget-conscious buyers. This shoe is best for those who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths

— Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
— Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption

Watch-outs

— Price hike from previous version at $169.95
— Poor breathability due to flat knit upper
— Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions

$134.95 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Hoka Gaviota 6	Saucony Hurricane 25
Weight	10 oz / 283g	10 oz / 283g
Stack Height	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot	40.2 mm
Drop	6mm	7.1 mm
Midsole	CMEVA and PROFLY+	PWRRUN PB foam
Stability	J-Frame	Guidesole
Arch Support	Moderate	Medium
Upper	Engineered mesh	Engineered mesh
Outsole	Rubber	XT-900 carbon rubber
Tech	—	CenterPath stability

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet