Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 vs Saucony Guide 18

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Guide 18 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.1 vs 4.4). The gap is mostly about overpronators seeking affordable stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
Ranked #8 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
$29.95as of Jun 7

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 is a moderate stability shoe designed for daily training, offering plush cushioning and a comfortable ride. Reviewers noted its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole delivers balanced shock absorption and energy return, with a heel stack height of 36.8mm. The updated upper features engineered mesh for structure and breathability, though some reviewers found it lacking in durability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed solid performance in cushioning and traction, though they noted the shoe's weight and upper breathability as drawbacks. This shoe is ideal for heel strikers seeking a versatile daily trainer but may not suit those wanting maximum stability or a minimalist feel.

Strengths
  • Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride
  • Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions
  • Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions
Watch-outs
  • Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers
  • Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz
  • Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs
Saucony Guide 18
Higher ratedRanked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Guide 18
$65.95as of Jun 7

The Saucony Guide 18 delivers dependable stability and pronation control, with Tom's Guide calling it a 'solid choice for stability seekers.' RunRepeat praised its exceptional upper breathability and cushioning for long runs, though noted the outsole design leaves too much foam exposed, potentially affecting durability. While reviewers appreciated the wide platform and secure lockdown, the midsole was described as firm and lacking in energy return compared to modern foams. This shoe is best suited for runners seeking a stable, supportive daily trainer at a reasonable price, but those looking for a more responsive ride may want to consider alternatives like the Brooks Glycerin GTS 21.

Strengths
  • Ultra-breathable upper design improves comfort and ventilation
  • Excellent pronation control and stable ride for overpronators
  • Cushioned enough for long runs and comfortable for walking
Watch-outs
  • Too much exposed foam on outsole raises durability concerns
  • Midsole feels a bit firm and lacks energy return
  • Outsole design doesn't provide sufficient rubber coverage for heavy strikers

How they stack up

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 offers more plush cushioning than the Saucony Tempus 2 and better durability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the ASICS GT-2000 14 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Guide 18.

Saucony Guide 18

The Saucony Guide 18 provides better breathability than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and more pronation control than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's less cushioned than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Specs side-by-side

SpecNew Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14Saucony Guide 18
Weight10.5 oz (298 g)273g (Men's)
Stack Height38 mm36.0 mm
Drop8 mm8mm
MidsoleFresh Foam XPWRRUN PB
StabilityMedial postGuidance Rail
Arch SupportModerateStability
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleBlown rubberXT-900 rubber
TechCenterPath stability
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet