Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Hurricane 25 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.
The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

Saucony Hurricane 25
Ranked #6 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Hurricane 25
5 sources$99.95as of Aug 1

RunRepeat's lab tests show real gains for the Saucony Hurricane 25 in energy return, cushioning, and comfort, and it sheds a full ounce along the way. Doctors of Running praised the bouncy, soft ride and the lighter profile against previous versions, while noting the softer midsole can feel mushy and less stable. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry make for a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, which suits daily trainers who want plush comfort with stability. Reviewers criticized the breathability and the bulk, both of which count against runners chasing agility or a lower price. It fits people who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths
  • Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
  • Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption
Watch-outs
  • Price hike from previous version at $169.95
  • Poor breathability due to flat knit upper
  • Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions
Saucony Tempus 2
Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Tempus 2
5 sources$169.95as of Aug 1

Still one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, the Saucony Tempus 2 runs on energetic PWRRUN PB foam with strong energy return. Reviewers praised the stability and durability, and RunRepeat called it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers who want a responsive daily trainer. The complaints center on a snug fit, particularly through the forefoot, and poor breathability. Doctors of Running noted the tapered toe box can cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short to lock the foot down. Runners with narrow to standard feet who want stability and energy return more than cushioning and airflow are the fit.

Strengths
  • Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
  • Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support
Watch-outs
  • Poor breathability in upper mesh
  • Slightly heavier than previous version
  • Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box

How they stack up

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

SpecSaucony Hurricane 25Saucony Tempus 2
Weight10 oz9.3 oz
Stack Height40.2 mm38 mm
Drop7.1 mm8 mm
MidsolePWRRUN PB foamPWRRUN PB
StabilityGuidesoleNeutral
Arch SupportMediumMedium
TechCenterPath stability
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleXT-900 carbon rubberXT-900 carbon rubber
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet