Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Guide 18 vs Saucony Hurricane 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.

The short answer

Saucony Guide 18 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.4 vs 4.3). The gap is mostly about overpronators seeking affordable stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Guide 18

4.4

8 sources$97.73as of Aug 1

Stability and pronation control are the Saucony Guide 18's job, and Tom's Guide calls it a 'solid choice for stability seekers.' RunRepeat praised the breathable upper and the cushioning on long runs while noting the outsole leaves too much foam exposed, which raises durability questions. Reviewers liked the wide platform and secure lockdown, though the midsole is firm and short on energy return next to modern foams. It fits runners who want a stable, supportive daily trainer at a reasonable price; anyone chasing a more responsive ride should consider the Brooks Glycerin GTS 21.

Strengths

— Ultra-breathable upper design improves comfort and ventilation
— Excellent pronation control and stable ride for overpronators
— Cushioned enough for long runs and comfortable for walking

Watch-outs

— Too much exposed foam on outsole raises durability concerns
— Midsole feels a bit firm and lacks energy return
— Outsole design doesn't provide sufficient rubber coverage for heavy strikers

$97.73 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #6 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Hurricane 25

4.3

5 sources$99.95as of Aug 1

RunRepeat's lab tests show real gains for the Saucony Hurricane 25 in energy return, cushioning, and comfort, and it sheds a full ounce along the way. Doctors of Running praised the bouncy, soft ride and the lighter profile against previous versions, while noting the softer midsole can feel mushy and less stable. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry make for a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, which suits daily trainers who want plush comfort with stability. Reviewers criticized the breathability and the bulk, both of which count against runners chasing agility or a lower price. It fits people who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths

— Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
— Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption

Watch-outs

— Price hike from previous version at $169.95
— Poor breathability due to flat knit upper
— Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions

$99.95 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Saucony Guide 18

The Saucony Guide 18 provides better breathability than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and more pronation control than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's less cushioned than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Saucony Guide 18	Saucony Hurricane 25
Weight	9.63 oz	10 oz
Stack Height	36.0 mm	40.2 mm
Drop	8mm	7.1 mm
Midsole	PWRRUN PB	PWRRUN PB foam
Stability	Guidance Rail	Guidesole
Arch Support	Stability	Medium
Tech	CenterPath stability	CenterPath stability
Upper	Engineered mesh	Engineered mesh
Outsole	XT-900 rubber	XT-900 carbon rubber

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet